Cambuslang Revival

Additional Info

Related Wells

[Show All 21 Wells]

Cambuslang Revival (1742)

The Duke of Hamilton held the patronage of the parish and for eight year had been trying to impose his own nominee on a congregation that wanted William M’Culloch. This bitter battle was finally ended in 1731 when Hamilton’s nominee accepted a position elsewhere. The parish was in a very low condition, so required a lot of work from the new minister;for a number of years he had opposition from members of his congregation.

M’Culloch was not a good preacher at all, but he had a passion for the things of God. He was in communication with Jonathan Edwards concerning the huge revival in America. The Spiritual atmosphere in America, the UK and in other parts of the World was pregnant with revival. M’Culloch was hungry and read out revival accounts on Sunday evenings after his sermon. This would undoubtedly have stirred up the spirits of his people. From about February 1741 he began to preach about the importance of being ‘born again’, or in the words of the time, ‘regeneration’.

At the end of August 1741 George Whitefield preached in Glasgow ten times in five days. At least 14 Cambuslang parishioners went to hear him preach; one heard him nine times and four times in Paisley. These parishioners would have brought back some of the anointing that was at these meetings. Revival anointing is transferrable, so the church would have been much stirred by the testimonies of these hungry Christians. Their reports confirmed to M’Culloch that he was on the right track teaching on regeneration.

There was an air of expectancy in the parish, with many praying for Revival to come.

The following is an eighteenth century account of the revival.

‘Cambuslang is a parish about four miles south-east of Glasgow, and, at the time of this revival, was under the pastoral care of Mr. M’Culloch, a man of decided piety and anxiously desirous of the spiritual welfare of his peo­ple. In his ordinary course of sermons for nearly a year before the work began, he had been preaching on those sub­jects which tend most directly to explain the nature and prove the necessity. of regeneration; and for some months before the remarkable events now about to be mentioned, a more then ordinary concern about religion appeared among his flock; as an evidence of which, a petition was given in to him, subscribed by about ninety heads of fa­milies, desiring a weekly lecture, which was readily granted. This was in the beginning of February, 1742. On the 15th of that month, the different prayer meetings in the parish assembled at his house, and next day they again met for solemn prayer, relative to the interests of the Gospel. Although this second meeting was of a more private de­scription, others getting notice of it, desired to join, and were admitted; and on the day following they met a third time for the same purpose. At this period, though several persons had come to the minister under deep concern about their salvation, there had been no great number; but on Thursday the 18th, after sermon, about fifty came to him under alarming apprehensions about the state of their souls; and such was their anxiety that he had to pass the night in conversing with them.

After this, the desire of the people for religious instruc­tion was so great, that Mr. M’Culloch found himself obliged to provide them a sermon almost daily; and after sermon, he had generally to spend some time with them in exhortation and prayer; and the blessing of God on these ordinances was so great, that by the beginning of May, the number of persons awakened to a deep concern about salvation exceeded three hundred.

About this time, (June 1742) Mr. Whitefield revisited Scotland, and in consequence of earnest invitations, he came to the west country, and to Cambuslang amongst other places, where, with his customary zeal, he preached three times on the very day of his arrival to a vast body of people, although he had preached the same morning at Glasgow. The last of these exercises began at nine in the evening, and continued till eleven; and such was the re­lish for the word of life, that Mr. M’Culloch preached after him till past one in the morning, and even then the people could hardly be persuaded to depart. All night, in the fields, the voice of prayer and praise was to be heard.

The sacrament of the supper was dispensed on the 11th of July, and the solemnity was so remarkably blessed that it was speedily repeated. The following extract of a. letter written by Mr. M’Culloch, giving an account of the pro­ceedings at this period, will be read with interest:—

“The dispensation of the sacrament was such a sweet and agreeable time to many that a motion was made by Mr. Webster, and immediately seconded by Mr. Whitefield, that we should have another such occasion in this place very soon. The motion was very agreeable to me, but I thought it needful to deliberate before coming to a resolu­tion. The thing proposed was extraordinary, but so had the work been for several months. Care was therefore taken to acquaint the several meetings for prayer, who re­lished the motion well and prayed for direction to those concerned to determine this matter. The session met next Lord’s day, and taking into consideration the divine com­mand to celebrate the ordinance often, joined with the extraordinary work that had been here for some time past.Understanding that many who had met with much benefit to their souls at the last solemnity had expressed an earnest desire of seeing another in this place shortly, and hearing that there were many who intended to have joined at the last occasion, but were kept back through inward discouragements or outward obstructions, and were wishing soon to see another opportunity of that kind here, to which they might have access;—it was therefore resol­ved, God willing, that the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper should be again dispensed in this parish, on the third Sab­bath of August.There was first one day, and then another, appointed for a general meeting of the several societies for prayer in the parish, at the manse, but as the manse could not conveniently hold them they went to the church; and when light failed them there a good many, of their own free motion, returned to the manse and con­tinued at prayer and praise till about one o’clock next morning. One design of these meetings was to ask that the Lord would continue and increase the blessed work of conviction and conversion, and eminently countenance the dispensing of the holy sacrament of the supper a second time in this place, thereby making the glory of this lat­ter solemnity to exceed that of the former.

“This second sacrament did, indeed, much excel the former, not only in the number of ministers, people and communicants, but, which is the main thing, in a much greater measure of the power and special presence of God, in the observation and experience of multitudes who were attending.

“The ministers who assisted at this solemnity were Mr. Whitefield, Mr. Webster from Edinburgh, Mr. M‘Laurin and Mr. Gillies from Glasgow, Mr. Robe from Kilsyth, Mr. Currie from Kinglassie, Mr. M’Kneight from Irvine, Mr. Bonner from Torphichen, Mr. Hamilton from Donglas, Mr. Henderson from Blantyre, Mr. Maxwell from Rutherglen and Mr. Adam from Cathcart. All of them appeared to be very much assisted in their work. Four of them preached on the fast day; four on Saturday; on Sab­bath I cannot well tell how many; and five on Monday; on which last day it was computed that above twenty-four ministers and preachers were present. Old Mr. Bonner, though so frail that he took three days to ride eighteen miles from Torphichen to Cambuslang, was so set upon coming here that he could by no means stay away; and when he was helped up to the tent, preached three times with great life and returned with much satisfaction and joy. Mr. Whitefield’s sermons on Saturday and Sabbath were attended with much power, particularly on Sabbath night about ten, and that on Monday, several crying out, and a very great but devout weeping and mourning was observable through the auditory. On Sabbath evening, while he was serving some tables, he appeared to be so filled with the love of God as to be in a kind of ecstacy or transport and communicated with much of that blessed frame.

“The number of people that were there on Saturday and Monday was very considerable: but the number pre­sent at the three tents on the Lord’s day was so great that, so far as I can hear, none ever saw the like since the Revolution in Scotland, nor even anywhere else, at any sacrament occasion; some have called them fifty thousand —some forty thousand. The lowest estimate I hear of, with which Mr. Whitefield agrees, who has been much used to great multitudes, makes them to have been up­wards of thirty thousand (these numbers are open to question as the whole population of Glasgow at this time was about half this number). “The number of communicants appears to have been about three thousand. The tables were doubled, and the double table was reckoned to contain one hundred and fourteen, one hundred and sixteen, or one hundred and twenty communicants. The number of tables I reckoned had been about twenty-four, but I have been since in­formed, that a man who sat near the tables, and kept a pen in his hand, and carefully marked each service, said that there were twenty-five double tables, the last wanting only five or six sitters to fill it up. And this account seems the most probable, as agreeing nearly with the number of tokens distributed, which was about three thousand. And some worthy of credit and that had proper opportunities to know, gave it as their opinion that there was such a blessed frame upon the people that if there had been ac­cess to tokens, there would have been a thousand more communicants.

“This vast concourse of people, you may easily imagine, came not only from the city of Glasgow and other places near by, but from many places at a considerable distance. It was reckoned there were two hundred communicants from Edinburgh, two hundred from Kilmarnock, one hun­dred from Irvine, and one hundred from Stewarton. It was observed that there were some from England and Ire­land at this occasion; a considerable number of Quakers were hearers, and some that had formerly been Seceders were communicants.

“There was a great deal of outward decency and regu­larity about the tables. Public worship began on the Lord’s day just at half-past eight in the morning. My action ser­mon, I think, was reasonably short. The third or fourth table was a-serving at twelve o’clock, and the last table about sunset. When that was done, the work was closed with a few words of exhortation, prayer and praise, the precentor having so much daylight as to let him read four lines of a psalm. The passes to and from the tables were, with great care, kept clear for the communicants. The tables filled so quickly that often there was no more time between one table and another than to sing four lines of a psalm. The tables were all served in the open air be­side the tent below the brae; the day was temperate, no rain nor wind in the least to disturb. Several persons of considerable rank and distinction who were elders, most cheerfully assisted our elders in serving tables; such as the honourable Charles Erskine Bruce of Kennet, Gillon of Wallhouse, and others.

“But what was most remarkable, was the spiritual glory of this solemnity; I mean the gracious and sensible pre­sence of God. Not a few were awakened to a sense of sin, and their lost and perishing condition without a Sa­viour. Others had their bands loosed and were brought into the glorious liberty of the sons of God. Many of God’s dear children have declared that it was a happy time to their souls, wherein they were abundantly satisfied with the goodness of God in his ordinances and filled with joy and peace in believing. I have seen a letter from Edin­burgh, the writer of which says that having talked with many Christians from that city who had been here at this sacrament they all owned that God had dealt bountifully with their souls. Some declared that they would not for the world have been absent from this solemnity. Others cried out, ‘Now let thy servants depart in peace from this place, since our eyes have seen thy salvation here.’ Others wishing, if it were the will of God, to die where they were, attending God in his ordinances without returning to the world or their friends, that they might be with Christ in heaven, as that which is incomparably best of all.”

Such is the substance of Mr. M’Culloch’s account of this remarkable period; and as Mr. Whitefield was fre­quently at Cambuslang about this time, the following ob­servations, given nearly in his own words, will be inter­esting. “Persons from all parts flocked to see, and many from many parts went home convinced and converted unto God. A brae, or hill, near the manse at Cambuslang, seemed to be formed by Providence for containing a large congregation. People sat unwearied till two in the morn­ing to hear sermons, disregarding the weather. You could scarce walk a yard but you must tread upon some, either rejoicing in God for mercies received, or crying out for more. Thousands and thousands have I seen, before it was possible to catch it by sympathy, melted down under the word and power of God. At the celebration of the Holy Communion, their joy was so great, that, at the de­sire of many, both ministers and people, in imitation of Hezekiah’s Passover, they had, a month or two afterwards, a second, which was a general rendezvous for the people of God. The communion-table was in the field; three tents at proper distances, all surrounded by a multitude of hearers; above twenty ministers (among whom was good old Mr. Bonner) attending to preach and assist, all enliven­ing and enlivened by one another.”

Amongst the multitudes that flocked to Cambuslang at this interesting period, there were persons who went with a design to find matter of diversion.While the bands of such mockers were, no doubt, generally made stronger, others were made happy monuments of divine grace. The case of two young men may be mentioned, as affording a striking example of sovereign mercy. They were very profane and had gone over to be amused with “the fall­ing” at Cambuslang, as they jestingly termed it. But in place of being amused, they were both impressed the same day. So deep were their convictions, that they were glad to get into a stable hard by for the purpose of sup­plicating that grace which they had hitherto despised.Their subsequent conduct afforded reason to conclude that the word they had that day heard had proved the saviour of life to their souls.

As to what these young men termed “the falling,” it was a way of speaking among scoffers at the time, occa­sioned by the bodily distress which, in many instances, accompanied conviction. Though the work was much objected to in consequence,when the intimate connection of soul and body is considered, it will not appear surprising that great outward agitation should mark the emotions of a soul fully awakened to the dread realities of judgment and eter­nity. The loss of a dear relative, and many of the other painful vicissitudes of life, when suddenly forced upon the mind, affect the bodily constitution so powerfully as, in some instances, to occasion even death. And if such is sometimes the effect of things merely temporal, need we wonder that a vivid sense of the sinner’s situation out of Christ, with nothing but the brittle thread of life between him and everlasting destruction, should overpower the body? The wonder rather is, that thepreaching of the solemn truths of God’s word is so rarely followed by such consequences; and we can account for this only by sup­posing that the Spirit of God does not make the sinner at once alive to all the terrors of his condition. With regard to the revival at Cambuslang, the greater number of the subjects of it were not observably under bodily distress, and as for those who were, their lives proved that they had been made partakers of divine grace, which is a proof that such agitation is, at least, not inconsistent with a work of the Holy Ghost.

The narrative now given has been fully attested by the most able and pious ministers of the time, and their at­testations might be transcribed here did space permit. Amongst others who have borne testimony to this glorious display of divine power are: Mr. M‘Laurin of the North­west Church of Glasgow (now St. David’s), well known by his remarkable sermon on the Cross of Christ; Mr. Hamilton of the Barony Parish; Mr. Hamilton of Bothwell; Mr. Ha­milton of Douglas; and Mr. Connell of Kilbride. Mr. Wil­lison of Dundee also has recorded his opinion, and the fol­lowing extract shows what were his sentiments: “Seeing some are desirous to know my thoughts of the work at Cambuslang, I am willing to own that Ihave travelled a good way to inquire and get satisfaction about it. And having resided several days in Mr. M’Culloch’s house, I had occasion to converse with many who had been awakened and under convictions there. I found several in darkness and great distress about their souls’ condition, and with many tears bewailing their sins and original corruption, and especially the sin of unbelief, and slighting of precious Christ. Others I found in a most desirable frame, over­come with a sense of the wonderful love and loveliness of Jesus Christ, even sick of love, and inviting all about them to help them to praise him. I spoke also with many who had got relief from their soul trouble, and in whom the gracious work of the Spirit of God appeared in the fruits and effects of it. According to my apprehension, such was their ingenuous confessing of their former evil ways, and professing a hatred to sin; very low and abasing thoughts of themselves; renouncing the vanities of the world, and all their own doings and righteousness, and their relying wholly upon Christ for righteousness and strength; and express­ing great love to Christ, to the Bible, to secret prayer, to the people of God, and to his image, in whomsoever it was, without respect of persons or parties; and also love to their enemies. I conversed with some who had been very wicked and scandalous, but now wonderfully changed. Though some were rude and boisterous before, they now had the meekness and mildness of the lamb about them, and though Iconversed with a great number, both men and women, old and young, I could observe nothing vision­ary or enthusiastic about them, for their discourses were solid, and experiences scriptural. I had heard much of this surprising work by letters, and by eye-witnesses before I came, but all that made slight impressions on me when compared with what Iwas eye- and ear-witness to myself. Upon the whole, Ilook upon the work at Cambuslang, to be a most singular and marvellous outpouring of the Holy Spirit, which Christ hath promised; and Ipray it may be a happy forerunner of a general reviving of the work of God in this poor decayed Church and a blessed mean of union among all the lovers of our dear Jesus.”

We have likewise the testimony of Mr. M’Culloch him­self, who, in a letter written about nine years after the revival, when ample time had been afforded to test the sincerity of the professions then made, writes nearly as follows: “Setting aside all those that appeared under awakenings here in 1742, who have since remarkably backslidden, there is a considerable number of the then awakened that appear to bring forth good fruits. Ido not talk of them at random, nor speak of their number in a loose, general and confused way, but have now before me, at the writing of this, April 27th, 1751, a list of about four hundred persons awakened here at Cambuslang in 1742. From that time to the time of their death, or to this, that is, for these nine years past, they have been all enabled to behave, in a good measure, as becometh the Gospel, by any thing I could ever see, and by the best information Icould get concerning them.” While this letter furnishes such satisfactory evidence of the reality of the work, the following paragraph, from the same communication, affords a beautiful proof of the humility of him who was a main instrument in promoting it. “When Imention such com­fortable abiding effects of this work, I would not have it ascribed to any creature, but that the entire glory of it should be given to God, whose work it was. It is true there were many ministers here from places near and more remote; and some of them men of great eminence who preached here at my desire, and who also joined with me in exhortation to souls appearing in spiritual distress, who resorted to the manse. But what could all these avail without the divine power and blessing? Whoever plant and water, it is God that gives the increase. Ministers are but instruments in his hands. No praise was due to the rams’ horns, though Jericho’s walls fell down at their blast: if God will vouchsafe that his word shall breathe through ministers, it is God, and not the means, must have the praise. It is very fit and reasonable that he that builds the temple should bear the glory; and Christ is both the foundation and founder of the Church, and therefore let all the glory be ascribed to him.”

This account was taken from, ‘Restoration in the Church, Reports on Revivals 1625-1839’ published by Christian Focus Publications. This is a copy of an earlier nineteenth century work. There was a great deal of trouble taken to attest to the work at Cambuslang; probably to try to silence the Moderate ministers in the Church of Scotland. Every move of God brings its detractors, so this was a very wise move. The work that M’Culloch did in following up the state of each of his parishioners shows without doubt the deep effect of the revival. There are many books on the Cambuslang Revival. Two of the more modern ones are, ‘The Cambuslang Revival,’ by Arthur Fawcett, published by the Banner of Truth Trust, 1971 and ‘Scotland Saw His Glory,’ compiled and edited by Richard Owen Roberts,published by International Awakening Press. ‘Narratives of the Extraordinary work of the Spirit of God at Cambuslang and Kilsyth begun 1742,’ by James Robe is a detailed account of the two revivals by the minister at Kilsyth that can be found at http://www.archive.org/stream/narrativesofthe00robeuoft.

Back to top